|
|
|
 |
Reviews |
 |
Source:
rec.art.movies.reviews newsgroup
Rating:
 
|
Rob Reiner has proved himself to be a fine director, though his scripts have occasionally been better directed than written. His latest film has just such problems. A FEW GOOD MEN is his film version of Aaron Sorkin's Broadway play with Sorkin himself writing the screenplay. Any court martial play invites comparison to Herman Wouk's "Caine Mutiny Court-Martial," and in several major aspects, Sorkin's play falls short.
Marine Pfc. William T. Santiago, stationed at Guantanamo, Cuba, just did not measure up to the high standards set by the U.S. Marine Corps. He is killed in a hazing incident perpetrated by Pfc. Lawson Downey and Lance Cpl. Harold W. Dawson. A mis-matched set of Navy lawyers is given the task of providing the defense in the court martial. And over the whole idea is the shadow of Col. Nathan Jessep (played by Jack Nicholson), who commands the Marines at Guantanamo. We know almost immediately that Jessep is the source of all the evil that has taken place. Little effort is spared in the script to make Jessep as vile and politically incorrect as possible The goals of our three defense lawyers--Lt. Cmdr. JoAnne Galloway (played by Demi Moore), Lt.(j.g.) Daniel Kaffee (played by Tom Cruise), and Lt. Sam Weinberg (played by Kevin Pollak)--are first, to stop conflicting with each other; second, to put together a case to help Downey and Dawson; and third, if possible, to at the same time bring down the incredibly nasty Col. Jessep. The result is a fun, entertaining, Kleenex-like sort of movie that is a long way from the classic that some critics are claiming it to be.
While I enjoyed the film, it did not work for me as a drama for three very strong reasons. The first is that the three lawyers are trying to defend two men who to better their position in the Marines were willing to stuff a rag in a man's mouth, seal his mouth and bind him with duct tape, and (in so doing) cause the man's death. It is a little hard to root for the lawyers defending them. It is even harder to root for this team of lawyers. In their own way they are every bit as unprofessional as Jessep. Kaffee and Galloway start out at each other's throats for the good reason that neither is particularly good as a lawyer. Cruise's Kaffee, slick and just a bit slimy as a lawyer, is lackadaisically doing his job and prides himself on his long list of low-effort court cases. Moore's Galloway is hopeless in her efforts to control Kaffee, and it is only Pollak as the sweet, healing, wise, Jewish lawyer who is able to hold the team together. These are flat, unengaging characters, and they are not written very well. But the film could have survived that if Nicholson's Jessep had been better written.
The third complaint is in the portrayal of Jessep. If the other characters are flat, the disgusting Jessep is linear. It is difficult to believe that this tactless, rather disgusting man could be given a position of prominence as he has been in this film. And it is a serious mistake to oversimplify the negative characters of the film, making them easier to detest. At no point do we see anything in the film from Jessep's point of view. How much would it compromise his character to show a little merit in his arguments? Bringing him down has much more dramatic impact if it is regrettable but necessary than if it is dragon-slaying. That brings me back to how much better a similar story was handled in the play "The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial" or nearly as well in the film THE CAINE MUTINY. A FEW GOOD MEN is a film whose conflict was asking to be fleshed out, but which preferred not to risk having the audience agree with the wrong side.
In the final analysis, we have a film that is entertaining without being provocative, but is enjoyable for mindless entertainment. From me it gets a low +1 on the -4 to +4 scale. I am a little surprised at the positive critical comment it has gotten elsewhere.
By : Mark R. Leeper
|
|
Source:
rec.art.movies.reviews newsgroup
Rating:
|
The past few years have been lacking genuinely well-told stories that are there for the essence of the yarn -- tales that make people think and feel. Movies of late have relied on special effects, sex, violence, controversy, and big names to bring in audiences, and this is the first movie in a while which I've seen that doesn't use any of these except the big names and doesn't rely on *any* of them to keep your attention.
The story starts out with the brutal beating and murder of a Private First Class at the United States Naval Base, Marine Barracks in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Moore, as the officer in Internal Affairs finds out about this case and wants to pursue this as a case of "Code Red," illegal hazing and beating of marines who are not up to par for some reason.
Her superiors deny her request to press this case, and forward it to Tom Cruise who plays a Harvard Law School graduate who has been out of school for nine months and in the Navy for only seven. He's had a history of brilliant plea-bargains, and has never actually defended a client in court.
Enter Nicholson, who is the Colonel in command of the Marines in Guantanamo Bay, and Sutherland, his right-hand man (well, once removed. :-) Nicholson's character ordered the "Code Red" which eventually led to the killing of the Private.
This is the premise for the story of getting to the truth, and Cruise and Moore's battle through Marine Code of Platoon, Corps, God, Country. They must dig out the truth through a group of highly disciplined soldiers who are trained to obey orders, and to put nothing above the word of their superiors.
Reiner did an outstanding job with the movie's direction, and Cruise was brilliant in a few courtroom scenes. Moore gave much of herself in her role as a very self-determined, stubborn, headstrong Naval Officer, and Nicholson played an unbelievable courtroom scene near the end of the movie.
Cinematography was well-done, and music was moderately-well-done.
This movie is a definite gem among today's common movies being released. Unlike others like BASIC INSTINCT, and TERMINATOR 2 it doesn't rely on gratuitous sex or violence to convey an extremely well-told story. There isn't any gore or "skin," although there is a bit of language spread through the film, although done well with the type of story being told. An extremely well-done story. A definite must-see.
By : Michael S. Huang
|
 |
Featured Posters |
|
|
